🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the current government is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive attacks on liberty have practically abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a British mosque. There should be widespread consensus that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you likely cannot establish limits at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens believe Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for holding signs opposing mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we allowed them to be eroded.